Trade agreements open many doors. With access to new markets, competition intensifies. Increasing competition is forcing companies to produce better quality products. It also leads to greater diversity for consumers. If there are a variety of high quality products, companies can improve customer satisfaction. The texts of the TTIP agreement are drawn up by 24 joint working groups between the EU and the US, each taking into account a separate aspect of the agreement. Development usually takes a number of phases. First, large-scale position papers will be exchanged, introducing each party`s objectives and ambitions for each aspect. This is followed by proposals for texts from both parties, accompanied (in areas such as tariffs and market access) by the “initial offer” of each party. These negotiations and draft documents can evolve during the different phases of their development. If both parties are ready, a consolidated text will be prepared, with the remaining differences of discussion expressed between brackets. These texts are then closed thematically when a working consensus is reached.
However, the agreement will be negotiated as a whole, so that no text of the subject will be finalized until a full consensus has been reached.  Several groups have written reports on the proposed agreement, including: Governments give some degree of control to an international agreement. The World Trade Organization`s agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS) has forced signatory states to strengthen intellectual property rights (also known as monopolistic intellectual privileges). This has probably had a negative impact on access to essential medicines in some countries, such as less developed countries, as the local economy is unable to produce more technical products such as medicines. The summit almost resulted in a third organization. This should be the very ambitious International Trade Organization (ITO). The 50 countries that started negotiations wanted an agency within the United Nations to create rules, not only for trade, but also for jobs, agreements on raw materials, trade practices, foreign direct investment and services. The ITO charter was adopted in March 1948, but the U.S. Congress and a few other countries refused to ratify it. In 1950, the Truman administration declared defeat and completed the ITO.
The GATT has introduced the most applied nation principle in customs agreements between members. Chapter IV, Articles 24-28, would allow the free movement of business leaders and other employees of a temporary work enterprise between all contracting states.  However, Article 1, paragraph 2, makes it clear that the free movement of workers and citizens is no longer permitted. The agreement has been criticised and rejected by some trade unions, charities, NGOs and environmentalists, particularly in Europe.  The Independent describes the frequent criticism of TTIP as “reducing regulatory barriers to large companies, food security, environmental legislation, banking regulation and the sovereignty of individual nations” or more critical as an “attack on European and American companies by transnational groups”.  The Guardian criticized the “undemocratic nature of closed-door talks,” “the influence of powerful lobbyists,” TTIP`s potential ability to “undermine the democratic authority of local authorities” and called it “the most controversial trade agreement the EU has ever negotiated.”  German economist Max Otte argued that TTIP would have a negative impact on European social models if it put European workers in direct competition with the Americans (because of the North American free trade agreement with Mexicans and Canadians.  An EU mechanism for direct democracy, the European Citizens` Initiative, which allows European citizens to directly ask the European Commission to propose legislation has garnered more than 3.2 million