ISDS cannot ask governments to overturn local laws (unlike the World Trade Organization) that violate trade agreements  but may award damages to investors affected by these laws.  As noted by the Office of the United States Trade Representative, isds requires specific infringements and does not allow companies to sue solely for “loss of profits.”  In January 2008, the United States began discussions with Pacific 4 (P4) members on trade liberalization in the financial services sector.  This resulted in 19 rounds of formal negotiations and a series of other meetings, such as. B the meetings of the chief negotiators and ministerial meetings, which culminated in the agreement announced on October 5, 2015. A version of the treaty text “subject to legal review” was published by potential contracting parties on 5 November 2015.  Parts of the draft comprehensive agreements have been disclosed to the public in advance.  Many of the provisions contained in the leaked documents are imbued with previous trade agreements. [Citation required] In 2014, linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky warned that the TPP “was designed to advance the neoliberal project of maximizing profit and supremacy and putting the world`s workers in competition with each other to reduce wages, to increase uncertainty.”  Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) argues that trade agreements such as the TPP “have destroyed families who end up working and enriched big business.”  Professor Robert Reich asserts that the TPP is a “Trojan horse in a global race to the bottom.”    Michael R. Wessel, former commissioner of the U.S.
Trade Deficit Review Commission, said in May 2015 that “cleared Advisors” as he “prohibits” him from “publicly sharing our criticisms of concrete proposals and approaches.” He stated that only portions of the text had been provided “to be read under the watchful eye of a USTR official”, that access to a secure government-run website did not contain the most up-to-date information, and that, for the advisers removed to obtain this information, he had to “go to certain government institutions and register to read the material” and “then , it has even designated the administration what we can verify and what we cannot verify, and they often provide carefully republisted summaries instead of the underlying text that is essential to understanding the consequences of the agreement.  Emily J. Blanchard argues that while the TPP has been severely criticized by the political left, progressives should support the TPP: “The TPP`s promise to create a new progressive regulatory framework – an agreement on child labour and discrimination in the workplace, measures to punish illegal logging and trade in protected species , as well as protection against consumer fraud – would be an essential step on the progressive agenda.  As part of the agreement, tariffs on U.S. industrial products and virtually all products of the U.S. market economy were eliminated almost immediately. However, some “sensitive” products would have been excluded until a date agreed at a later date. ECIPE said in 2014 that the TPP would be “the first” competing economic integration large enough to have a significant negative impact on Europe. In the long term, the negative effects of investment, productivity and competitiveness will result from dynamic effects such as. B investment, productivity and competitiveness.  Pascal Lamy called the TPP “the last of the great old-style trade agreements.” :2 As with many trade agreements, the TPP negotiations were conducted in great secrecy until they were concluded.